We felt that the KJVOnly? Debate was very successful, and generated much intellectual discussion and interest. The only problem was, the pro-KJV camp(s) were a bit outflanked and left rather powerless when it came to refereeing the debates.
In the interests of fairness, we have invited several pro-Traditional text debaters to post their own articles freely, and let the chips fall where they may. This should prevent any charges of bias or censorship on the administrative side, and any also any blame or excuse for unconvincing arguments or failed communications.
Sincerely, Joe Layman.
Bible versions, Greek New Testament, Textual Criticism, history of the Bible, Westcott Hort, 'modern' versions, KJV, NIV, NA27, UBS, omitted verses, word of God, textual transmission, history
No comments:
Post a Comment