tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5147898896216997812.post5752383081642321207..comments2023-10-09T07:21:32.237-07:00Comments on kjvonly2: Ancestors of Aleph/B: Matthew OverlaidJoe Laymanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00703047898681228904noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5147898896216997812.post-42873006976937575312010-12-29T22:24:47.097-08:002010-12-29T22:24:47.097-08:00yep. Mr.scrivener seems to have left out Revelati...yep. Mr.scrivener seems to have left out Revelation as well. Obviously, some of these late additions to the collections are going to have a different (and hopefully distinguishable) textual history.<br /><br />I think he started with the gospels for the obvious reasons, but we'll have to see how it goes.<br /><br />peace<br />NazarooNazaroohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03584331774685466296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5147898896216997812.post-25519941695208049902010-12-28T18:57:51.983-08:002010-12-28T18:57:51.983-08:00The Ancestors of Aleph/B needs some work. For one ...The Ancestors of Aleph/B needs some work. For one thing, Hebrews was never one of the General Epistles. It doesn't appear to have been part of the original Pauline corpus, but once canonized was added to Paul, either in order of book size, or tacked on at the end of the ecclesiastics or pastorals.The White Manhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732782601569135839noreply@blogger.com